Tag: camera sensors

Posted on by

Full Frame vs. APS-C vs. Micro Four Thirds Camera Sensors

Full Frame vs. APS-C vs. Micro Four Thirds Camera Sensors

What’s the difference between full-frame vs APS-C vs Micro Four Thirds sensors? And how do these sensor distinctions affect your images?
Thinking about video camera sensors can get pretty confusing. That’s why I break all of it down for you in this article– and I provide plenty of examples to show the electronic camera sensor impacts.
If you want to know, when and for all, how sensor type impacts your images, then let’s get started.

What is a full-frame vs an APS-C (crop) vs a Micro Four Thirds (MFT) cam?


The sensor is the part of a camera that really catches an image. It takes in light, which it then converts to image information.
Now, different camera types provide different-sized sensing units, which’s the basic difference between full-frame, APS-C, and Micro Four Thirds video cameras.
A full-frame video camera contains a sensor size equivalent to 35mm movie (36 mm x 24 mm). This is the biggest sensor size marketed to photography consumers.
An APS-C camera, on the other hand, has a smaller sized sensor. The specifics depend upon the electronic camera brand, but the sensing unit size is generally around 23 mm x 15 mm.
There are Micro 4 Thirds cams, which consist of Micro Four Thirds sensors; these are even smaller than APS-C sensors, clocking in at just 17.3 mm x 13 mm.
Now, apart from the physical sizes, there are a number of important distinctions between full-frame, APS-C, and Micro 4 Thirds sensing units.
So let’s take a look at the factors impacted by sensing unit size, starting with:

Crop Factor

State you mount a 50mm lens on a full-frame video camera. When you press the shutter button, it catches a 50mm image.
Makes sense, right? A 50mm lens captures a 50mm image. Simple.
But what if you install a 50mm lens on an APS-C electronic camera? Will it capture a 50mm image?
The answer is no.
Because an APS-C sensing unit is smaller than the full-frame sensor, the sensor crops the frame, giving you an outcome that looks zoomed in-as if you took the image with a 75mm lens instead of a 50mm lens.
The effect is similar to taking an image with a 50mm lens, then heading house and cropping the image on your computer system. You’ll get a tighter shot, one that looks like it was taken with a longer lens.).
And that is what the term crop factor implies. It refers to the various crop results produced by different sensor sizes. A full-frame cam is the requirement; it has no crop element. An APS-C sensor (also known as a crop sensing unit), has a crop factor of 1.5 x (on Nikon and Sony video cameras) or 1.6 x (on Canon cams). The Micro Four Thirds crop element is even stronger: 2x.

Focal length

A crop element has a predictable affect on your lens’s focal length.
You see, the focal length measurement of any provided lens is based on the basic 35mm movie format. And since an APS-C video camera (and a Micro Four Thirds video camera) crop out the edges of the frame, you wind up with an “efficient” focal length that corresponds straight to the initial focal length increased by the crop element.
A crop-sensor cam such as the Nikon D5600 has a crop factor of 1.5 x. Thus, if I install a 35mm lens on my Nikon D5600, it would multiply the focal length by 1.5 x, efficiently offering me a focal length output of around 52.5 mm.
( But if you mount the same lens on a full-frame Nikon body such as the D850, it provides an output of 35mm.).
Likewise, if you install a 35mm lens on a Micro 4 Thirds camera– which has a crop factor of 2x– it efficiently doubles the focal length to around 70mm.

Depth of field

As with focal length, a multiplier effect gets applied to the aperture when using APS-C and MFT electronic cameras.
The aperture or f-stop is among a number of factors determining the depth of field. Thus, a Micro 4 Thirds camera offers us more depth of field when compared to a full-frame camera, assuming both video cameras are utilizing equivalent reliable focal lengths. Exact same with an APS-C cam compared to a full-frame electronic camera; you get more depth of field using the APS-C cam, assuming the effective focal length on both video cameras equals.
An image shot at f/1.8 on a Micro 4 Thirds video camera offers an output comparable to an image shot at f/3.6 on a full-frame electronic camera and f/2.7 on a crop-sensor video camera. This is assuming that the efficient focal length and other shooting conditions remain the exact same.


Full-frame sensing units are larger than APS-C and Micro Four Thirds sensing units.
As you can probably guess, full-frame video cameras tend to be far larger and much heavier than their APS-C and MFT equivalents.
For some professional photographers, this won’t matter much; if you shoot in the studio every day, a smaller sized Micro 4 Thirds cam will not use much of an advantage.
If you’re a travel photographer who needs to keep your gear as light-weight and compact as possible, a Micro Four Thirds body is a wonderful choice.
Plus, APS-C and MFT video cameras are more convenient. You can hang them on your neck or keep them in a knapsack throughout the day without seeming like you’re bring a brick.

Low-light Performance


Generally, full-frame cameras include superior low-light and high-ISO performance. This results in much better image quality than crop-sensor (or Micro 4 Thirds) electronic cameras can accomplish.
But why do full-frame cameras carry out much better in low light?
Full-frame cams have bigger sensing units and are therefore efficient in catching more light than their smaller-sensor equivalents, which lessens unwanted sound.
Micro Four Thirds video cameras do not perform well under low-light conditions where the ISO needs to be cranked up to, say, above 1600.
( Note that full-frame cameras likewise provide superior dynamic variety, which permits you to record more information in a single shot.).
For these factors, while full-frame cams can be costly, bulky, and frustrating to carry around, they are still the industry requirement and the preferred cams for nearly all expert photography work.

Full frame vs APS-C vs Micro Four Thirds: conclusion

Now that you’ve completed this article, you must hopefully have a grasp on the distinctions in between these sensing unit types– and why you may wish to choose one sensor over another.
Simply keep in mind:.
All three sensors– complete frame, APS-C, and MFT– are very capable of capturing spectacular photos.
Don’t worry too much about the distinctions.
Do you have a preferred sensor type? Which of these three sensors does your camera use? Share your ideas in the comments below!

Posted on by

What are compact system cameras?

compact camera

An increasingly popular sector of the electronic camera market is available in the form of the compact system camera, or hybrid electronic camera. Here we describe what Compact System Cameras are, why you might want one, and what’s available…

Once upon a time, if you wished to buy a digital electronic camera you’d have the choice of a compact, a bridge (a compact with a high-magnification zoom) or a DSLR. The step up to a DSLR was a big one, actually. DSLRs are much bigger than compacts not only due to the fact that they have much larger sensors, but because the seeing system that specifies them as DSLRs- a 45 ° mirror showing approximately a prism assembly and viewfinder eyepiece- uses up a lot of space.

Panasonic and Olympus were the first to realise that if you eliminated the DSLR’s optical watching assembly you might still have a large sensor, and interchangeable lenses, but the electronic camera could be much smaller sized, and the lenses could be smaller too. In 2008 Panasonic’s Lumix G1 was the first electronic camera with a DSLR sized sensing unit and interchangeable lenses to dispense with the mirror and prism, and switch the optical finder for an electronic one.

Compact System Cam (CSC) tends to be the most commonly accepted term for cams like this. MILC (Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Electronic camera) or merely ILC, or simply “Mirrorless” are likewise used, along with “hybrid cams”. Whatever they’re called, every producer now has at least one such camera of its own, with an accompanying range of lenses, but the original aims of the first CSCs– to provide the image quality and interchangeable lenses of a DSLR, but in a smaller sized package– no longer necessarily use, as producers have actually plumped for a wide variety of various sensing unit sizes all the way approximately full-frame (35mm).

It’s most likely fair to say that today’s meaning of a CSC is a cam with interchangeable lenses however no mirror. Some have DSLR sensing units, some have smaller sized ones, some have electronic viewfinders, others have no viewfinder– just the LCD screen.

Here we provide a round-up of the various systems presently readily available, and what they have to use.

Why buy a compact system electronic cameras?

Compact System Cameras, or hybrid video cameras, are created for buyers looking for a video camera that provides lots of imaginative control, high image quality and the choice to attach various lenses, however who do not typically want the bulk of a DSLR. Some are almost as huge as a DSLR however provide a various user experience, due to the camera’s shape and style. Some utilize a smaller sensing unit, while we’re likewise progressively seeing terrific feats of design where the sensor is big, but the body remains little for the very best of both worlds.

Other aspects require to be taken into consideration too. Some CSCs use the contrast spot method of focusing, which is slower than the stage find technique utilized by DSLRs. This can make many CSCs normally less fit to action photography, though there are some exceptions– the Nikon 1 system is blisteringly fast, and a couple of CSCs have phase detect pixels constructed into the sensing unit.

Many CSCs have viewfinders, but some offer just an LCD screen, which can make them more difficult to use in intense sun. A few have the alternative of a clip-on EVF at extra cost. Of those with a viewfinder it will be electronic– the technology of which is rapidly enhancing every day and some offer extremely high resolutions.

Some video cameras with EVFs are styled like mini DSLRs, while others follow more of a rangefinder style. Neither is better, it’s down to personal taste. Finally, consider what other functions are necessary to you. What about video? All deal HD video but bit rates and compression options vary, and just a few offer an external mic input. Some also offer 4K video shooting. If you want Wi-Fi, the bright side is that it’s tough to find a current CSC design without it. Such a feature not just lets you release online straight from the camera however often likewise enables you to control the video camera remotely with a smart device.

Sensor sizes and image quality

As a really general guideline (and there are numerous significant exceptions), larger electronic cameras have larger sensors, which produce better quality images, so choosing a system entails first deciding how crucial image quality is compared with mobility and convenience. It’s now possible to find CSCs or hybrid electronic cameras with sensing units varying all the way up to full-frame (35mm). It ought to be mentioned that even the smallest video cameras can produce high quality images to at least A4 at the lower ISO settings, and it’s just when you go larger than that, crop greatly, or utilize high ISOs that the more knowledgeable, critical eye can discern the differences between the systems. So how do the sensing unit sizes vary between the electronic camera systems? This diagram (below) highlights the relative sizes of the sensors used by the various CSC manufacturers. The biggest, full-frame, is the one utilized in expert and high-end enthusiast DSLRs, while the second largest, APS-C, is the one used in many customer DSLRs. The Pentax Q7 uses a little sensor (1/1.7 in) frequently used in some higher-end compacts.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

What is Camera Sensor?

In the broadest terms, a digital cam sensor is a solid-state device that is sensitive to light. When photons are focused on the sensing unit by your DSLR’s lens, those photons are signed up and, if sufficient build up, are translated into digital signal to produce an image map you can see on your cam’s LCD and transfer to your computer for editing.

The process of making a sensing unit

What basically happens is that wafers of silicon are used as the base for the integrated circuit, which are developed through a process called photolithography. This is where the patterns of the circuitry are repeatedly predicted onto the (sensitized) wafer, before being dealt with so that only the pattern remains. Funnily enough, this bears many similarities to traditional photographic processes, such as those utilized in a darkroom when developing movie and printing.

This process develops countless tiny wells known as pixels, and in each pixel there will be a light delicate component which can pick up the number of photons have come to that specific place. As the charge output from each location is proportional to the intensity of light falling onto it, it ends up being possible to recreate the scene as the professional photographer initially saw it– however a variety of processes need to take place before this is all possible.

As sensing unit is an analogue device, this charge initially needs to be converted into a signal, which is magnified before it is converted into a digital kind. So, an image may eventually look like a collection of various items and colours, but at a more fundamental level each pixel is merely provided a number so that it can be comprehended by a computer system (if you zoom into any digital image far enough you will be able to see that each pixel is simply a single coloured square).

A well as being an analogue device, a sensor is also colour blind. For it to sense different colours a mosaic of coloured filters is put over the sensing unit, with twice as lots of green filters as there are of each red and blue, to match the heightened level of sensitivity of the human visual system towards the colour green. This system implies that each pixel only gets colour information for either red, green or blue– as such, the values for the other 2 colours needs to be thought by a process known as demosaicing. The option to this system the Foveon sensor, which uses layers of silicon to take in various wavelengths, the result being that each place receives complete colour info.

The Megapixel myth – Is more much better?

At one point it was essential to establish sensing units with a growing number of pixels, as the earliest types were not adequate for the needs of printing. That barrier was quickly broken, but sensors continued to be developed with a greater number of pixels, and compacts that once had two or three megapixels were quickly changed by the next generation of 4 of 5 megapixel versions. This has actually now escalated up to the 20MP compact cams on the marketplace today. As helpful as this is for manufacturers from a marketing viewpoint, it did little to educate customers regarding how many were needed-and more notably, just how much was excessive.

More pixels can mean more in details, but the size of the sensor is crucial for this to hold true: this is essentially because smaller pixels are less efficient than larger ones. The main attributes which separate images from compact cameras (with small sensors) and those from DSLRs, Compact Sytem Cameras or compact cameras with a large sensor are dynamic range and noise, and the latter types of camera fare better with regards to each. As its pixels can be made larger, they can hold more light in relation to the noise created by the sensor through its operation, and a higher ratio in favour of the signal produces a cleaner image. Noise reduction technology, used in most cameras, aims to cover up any noise which has formed in the image, but this is normally only attainable by compromising its detail. This is standard on basic cameras and usually cannot be deactivated, unlike on some advanced cameras where the option to do so is provided (meaning you can take more care to process it out later yourself).

The increased capacity of larger pixels likewise indicates that they can include more light before they are full– and a complete pixel is essentially a blown emphasize. When this occurs on a largely populated sensing unit, it’s easy for the charge from one pixel to overflow to neighbouring websites, which is known as flowering. By contrast, a bigger pixel can consist of a greater range of tonal worth’s before this happens, and specific ranges of sensor will be fitted with anti-blooming gates to drain pipes off excess charge. The drawback to this is that the gates themselves require space on the sensor, and so once again jeopardize the size of each specific pixel.

Kinds of Sensors

Capturing the photons effectively and precisely is the challenging part. There’s a lot more to understand about sensors than the variety of megapixels. There are great reasons that one 15 megapixel sensor and its electronic devices produce merely excellent photos, whereas a different sensing unit in the very same resolution range is capable of marvellous results.

There are two primary types of sensing units utilized in digital video cameras, called CCD (for charge paired gadget) and CMOS (for complementary metal oxide semiconductor). Thankfully, today there is little need to understand the technical differences in between them, or, even which kind of sensor lives in your camera. Early in the game, CCDs were the choice for premium image capture, while CMOS chips were the low-cost alternative utilized for less important applications. Today, innovation has advanced so that CMOS sensors have actually conquered essentially all the benefits CCD imagers formerly had, so that CMOS has actually ended up being the dominant image capture gadget, with just a few cams using CCDs staying.